Sunday, May 31, 2009
End of Week 3
I am still reading Double Fold which should be required reading for all librarians and archivists, no matter if they are in school or not. At least they should be made aware of its existence. Though the tone of Baker is a little too overwrought, I like his passion and detail in regards to the history of the cabal that has been advocating microfilming and downsizing collections. Baker takes on the supposed leaders in the field (ca. mid-20th century) and shows how their zeal for technology and ruthlessness in regards to destruction of hard copy has wiped out entire blocks of our history - very 1984 in a way (sorry for the hackneyed analogy). I also like how Baker equates or associates the CIA and academia during the Cold War. I was not aware of how close they all were (I don't have the book handy to make detailed references but there are many examples) and how this affected the information sciences. I guess it makes sense that our national interests during this period in our history would want to understand all aspects of data through the intelligentsia's research habits though it is just a little scary.
Friday, May 29, 2009
World Cat, RIS, etc.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Week 3 : Starting Late...
Sunday, May 24, 2009
End of week
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Tough Week
Well, I'm wondering what have I gotten myself into. I spent much more time than I should have yesterday trying to figure out how to download rss feeds into Google Reader.I am still working on it yet the mechanical aspects of it are all simple. I really need to catch up on my reading so I can understand what I am actually doing: I'm still not exactly clear about how to capture these feeds, at least through Scopus - don't know why this is bothering me so much but I guess I am thinking too much about it. My most important problem right now is time management - there is so much to take in (reading especially) and little time to get it all done.
Speaking of reading...LIS 2000 lecture on Kuhn was very good and helped alot in understanding the book. Thought it was interesting that peolple from the liberal arts in general do not like the book because it is poorly written - which it is , but the concepts are simple to understand - makes me wonder how much easier life would be if we all had our own editors so that others could understand us and vice versa. Good night.